WARNING: Version 6.0 of the Elastic Stack has passed its EOL date.
This documentation is no longer being maintained and may be removed. If you are running this version, we strongly advise you to upgrade. For the latest information, see the current release documentation.
Setting Up Field and Document Level Security
editSetting Up Field and Document Level Security
editYou can control access to data within an index by adding field and document level security permissions to a role. Field level security permissions restrict access to particular fields within a document. Document level security permissions restrict access to particular documents within an index.
Document and field level security is currently meant to operate with read-only privileged accounts. Users with document and field level security enabled for an index should not perform write operations.
A role can define both field and document level permissions on a per-index basis. A role that doesn’t specify field level permissions grants access to ALL fields. Similarly, a role that doesn’t specify document level permissions grants access to ALL documents in the index.
When assigning users multiple roles, be careful that you don’t inadvertently grant wider access than intended. Each user has a single set of field level and document level permissions per index. See Multiple Roles with Document and Field Level Security.
Field Level Security
editTo enable field level security, specify the fields that each role can access as part of the indices permissions in a role definition. Field level security is thus bound to a well-defined set of indices (and potentially a set of documents).
The following role definition grants read access only to the category
,
@timestamp
, and message
fields in all the events-*
indices.
{ "indices": [ { "names": [ "events-*" ], "privileges": [ "read" ], "field_security" : { "grant" : [ "category", "@timestamp", "message" ] } } ] }
To allow access to the _all
meta field, you must explicitly list it as an
allowed field. Access to the following meta fields is always allowed: _id
,
_type
, _parent
, _routing
, _timestamp
, _ttl
, _size
and _index
. If
you specify an empty list of fields, only these meta fields are accessible.
Omitting the fields entry entirely disables field-level security.
You can also specify field expressions. For example, the following
example grants read access to all fields that start with an event_
prefix:
{ "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "*" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "field_security" : { "grant" : [ "event_*" ] } } ] }
Use the dot notations to refer to nested fields in more complex documents. For example, assuming the following document:
{ "customer": { "handle": "Jim", "email": "[email protected]", "phone": "555-555-5555" } }
The following role definition enables only read access to the customer handle
field:
{ "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "*" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "field_security" : { "grant" : [ "customer.handle" ] } } ] }
This is where wildcard support shines. For example, use customer.*
to enable
only read access to the customer
data:
{ "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "*" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "field_security" : { "grant" : [ "customer.*" ] } } ] }
You can deny permission to access fields with the following syntax:
{ "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "*" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "field_security" : { "grant" : [ "*"], "except": [ "customer.handle" ] } } ] }
The following rules apply:
-
The absence of
field_security
in a role is equivalent to * access. - If permission has been granted explicitly to some fields, you can specify denied fields. The denied fields must be a subset of the fields to which permissions were granted.
- Defining denied and granted fields implies access to all granted fields except those which match the pattern in the denied fields.
For example:
{ "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "*" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "field_security" : { "except": [ "customer.handle" ], "grant" : [ "customer.*" ] } } ] }
In the above example, users can read all fields with the prefix "customer." except for "customer.handle".
An empty array for grant
(for example, "grant" : []
) means that access has
not been granted to any fields.
Field Level Security and Roles
editWhen a user has several roles that specify field level permissions, the resulting field level permissions per index are the union of the individual role permissions. For example, if these two roles are merged:
{ // role 1 ... "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "*" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "field_security" : { "grant": [ "a.*" ], "except" : [ "a.b*" ] } } ] } { // role 2 ... "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "*" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "field_security" : { "grant": [ "a.b*" ], "except" : [ "a.b.c*" ] } } ] }
The resulting permission is equal to:
{ // role 1 + role 2 ... "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "*" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "field_security" : { "grant": [ "a.*" ], "except" : [ "a.b.c*" ] } } ] }
Document Level Security
editDocument level security restricts the documents that users have read access to. To enable document level security, specify a query that matches all the accessible documents as part of the indices permissions within a role definition. Document level security is thus bound to a well defined set of indices.
Enabling document level security restricts which documents can be accessed from
any document-based read API. To enable document level security, you use a query
to specify the documents that each role can access in the roles.yml
file.
You specify the document query with the query
option. The document query is
associated with a particular index or index pattern and operates in conjunction
with the privileges specified for the indices.
The following role definition grants read access only to documents that
belong to the click
category within all the events-*
indices:
{ "indices": [ { "names": [ "events-*" ], "privileges": [ "read" ], "query": "{\"match\": {\"category\": \"click\"}}" } ] }
Omitting the query
entry entirely disables document level security for
the respective indices permission entry.
The specified query
expects the same format as if it was defined in the
search request and supports the full Elasticsearch Query DSL.
For example, the following role grants read access only to the documents whose
department_id
equals 12
:
{ "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "*" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "query" : { "term" : { "department_id" : 12 } } } ] }
query
also accepts queries written as string values.
Templating a Role Query
editYou can use Mustache templates in a role query to insert the username of the
current authenticated user into the role. Like other places in Elasticsearch that support
templating or scripting, you can specify inline, stored, or file-based templates
and define custom parameters. You access the details for the current
authenticated user through the _user
parameter.
For example, the following role query uses a template to insert the username of the current authenticated user:
{ "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "my_index" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "query" : { "template" : { "source" : { "term" : { "acl.username" : "{{_user.username}}" } } } } } ] }
You can access the following information through the _user
variable:
Property | Description |
---|---|
|
The username of the current authenticated user. |
|
If specified, the full name of the current authenticated user. |
|
If specified, the email of the current authenticated user. |
|
If associated, a list of the role names of the current authenticated user. |
|
If specified, a hash holding custom metadata of the current authenticated user. |
You can also access custom user metadata. For example, if you maintain a
group_id
in your user metadata, you can apply document level security
based on the group.id
field in your documents:
{ "indices" : [ { "names" : [ "my_index" ], "privileges" : [ "read" ], "query" : { "template" : { "source" : { "term" : { "group.id" : "{{_user.metadata.group_id}}" } } } } } ] }
Set Security User Ingest Processor
editIf an index is shared by many small users it makes sense to put all these users
into the same index. Having a dedicated index or shard per user is wasteful.
To guarantee that a user reads only their own documents, it makes sense to set up
document level security. In this scenario, each document must have the username
or role name associated with it, so that this information can be used by the
role query for document level security. This is a situation where the
set_security_user
ingest processor can help.
Document level security doesn’t apply to write APIs. You must use unique ids for each user that uses the same index, otherwise they might overwrite other users' documents. The ingest processor just adds properties for the current authenticated user to the documents that are being indexed.
The set_security_user
processor attaches user-related details (such as
username
, roles
, email
, full_name
and metadata
) from the current
authenticated user to the current document by pre-processing the ingest. When
you index data with an ingest pipeline, user details are automatically attached
to the document. For example:
PUT shared-logs/log/1?pipeline=my_pipeline_id { ... }
Read the ingest docs for more information about setting up a pipeline and other processors.
Table 7. Set Security User Options
Name | Required | Default | Description |
---|---|---|---|
|
yes |
- |
The field to store the user information into. |
|
no |
[ |
Controls what user related properties are added to the |
The following example adds all user details for the current authenticated user
to the user
field for all documents that are processed by this pipeline:
{ "processors" : [ { "set_security_user": { "field": "user" } } ] }
Multiple Roles with Document and Field Level Security
editA user can have many roles and each role can define different permissions on the same index. It is important to understand the behavior of document and field level security in this scenario.
Document level security takes into account each role held by the user and combines each document level security query for a given index with an "OR". This means that only one of the role queries must match for a document to be returned. For example, if a role grants access to an index without document level security and another grants access with document level security, document level security is not applied; the user with both roles has access to all of the documents in the index.
Field level security takes into account each role the user has and combines all of the fields listed into a single set for each index. For example, if a role grants access to an index without field level security and another grants access with field level security, field level security is not be applied for that index; the user with both roles has access to all of the fields in the index.
For example, let’s say role_a
grants access to only the address
field of the
documents in index1
; it doesn’t specify any document restrictions. Conversely,
role_b
limits access to a subset of the documents in index1
; it doesn’t
specify any field restrictions. If you assign a user both roles, role_a
gives
the user access to all documents and role_b
gives the user access to all
fields.
If you need to restrict access to both documents and fields, consider splitting documents by index instead.